Deng
first like to talk about the early history, my personal observations about historical figures, historical events and historical process, the basic framework for analysis. Why? If you do not first make a brief statement of the framework, then, the students, when in contact with my point of view, it is possible bias or misunderstanding, and perhaps even confrontation, anger, which I deeply know. So I have to explain my view of history, to talk about how I look at history. On this basis, it was possible to In this case, we can avoid misunderstandings between.
to talk about my history, I'm from the most simple of course, talking about from personal life experiences. In last night's I said, I do not value academics and the scholars of China on the ideological and social observation, and more looking at the people, ordinary people value the social observation and thinking. Because ordinary people ordinary people he has a heart, there is a common sense I have always stressed, only natural and common sense; and scholars have often lost their common sense common sense stands to reason that the concept into a person, the concept of sociological theory in person. That is, he did not experience in life is completely out of the knowledge of school culture were entirely abstract words piled into people. He did not direct experience of life, not cut into the bone marrow of the emotional experience of society, but rather the accumulation of knowledge, is the concept of inference, his personal life did not go into the middle of knowledge, knowledge and life beaten two parts. Such people do out of knowledge, as I said, is So I do not believe those so-called scholars say, and more attention to ordinary people, ordinary people looked at us (including our students) their thoughts, the mouth said, the pen to write something. So, I will be more problems for the students, for the issues of ordinary people in society I think. I was in the response and the process of thinking about these issues, some of formed my own ideas.
I first want to talk about is that I Recently experience. Probably starting in 2008, Chinese nationalists, leftists, the New Left, populism launched several rounds of attacks on me personally, many students and teachers as I am concerned, I thank them, but I do not have to worry about large I was very calm. The more I was to this I took these as part of this society's thinking and emotional expression,UGG bailey button, from which I can capture the potential of our society, a way of thinking and expression patterns. For example in April of that on the Among some students in this seminar, including the presence of Inner Mongolia, a prosecutor, raised several questions on the spot, although some problems seem ridiculous, but I think these questions are important. The first problem is the oil made the University a graduate student, he said, So I think he is behind this view there is a deep, deep inside the ideological background, but he did not know, or even listen to the students that we do not know. Why would he say such a point of view? His views in the end there is no reasonable? If there is no reasonable, then, it was wrong in what areas? If it is wrong, it comes from where? This is what I have been thinking about several issues, I have several articles on these issues to start (see Another point is: I was cited purge by Mao Zedong in Jinggangshan AB group at the number of people killed, starved to death during the Great Famine of the 30.005 million, six million such numbers, then the students who said: Stalin murder. Stalin killed more people than Mao Zedong also. In. so can be forgiven for Mao Zedong. This view was wrong in that place it in the end? What in the end it comes from the ideological background? These issues have not thought that our students, but as a history teacher, as a historical researcher, I must think. A training in our school in Inner Mongolia prosecutors raised another question, this question should be said to be very challenging. He said: , but I know he's a potential answer. So I was writing an article, This is a lecture on the spot to leave the issues that I think of our theorists, scholars of history constitutes a challenge to some extent, although many historians feel that this issue is not worthy of response, but I think it can not be avoided.
addition to the three questions on the spot, there was more in line problems I first briefly listed. There is a saying should be said that a significant influence. August consensus founder Mr. Zhou Zhixing network to Shanghai, there is a small academic discussion. One of them said that such a passage - the original is this:
Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, Zhejiang Ryan is a young group of about four years old, neat appearance, red glow, a look that is successful Business disabilities. During the reception, the only time he spoke was A review of: This society is not there more people thinking the same thing? In fact not only the Chamber of Commerce say that as I come into contact with, the writer Zhang Xianliang in In the Mao era, people are still subjected to significant trauma a writer, he is a right, but he has to say such a word. So I think this is not someone short moment of thought, and has a certain universality. such an argument cause I'm thinking: it comes from where? Why is this ridiculous claim? it wrong somewhere? ... ...
schools and our students a Tingyou thought (I was actually very The students appreciate the talent), he wrote in criticism when we talk of an article which proposed such a view: Jinggangshan period, the CCP is still at an early age, at an early age do not allow it to make a mistake? You can Request a children think and act like adults, do not make a mistake? You think we Chinese Communist Party in Yan'an to mature, so it is growing, and successful ... .... Of course, this view seems to come from a famous work, called br> There is also a mention last night is my point of view, this view is that twenty years ago a friend with me Kenshin proposed. He is not a scholar, but very concerned about the question of history, read a lot of books , especially biographies, so he said when summing up historical experiences some views, these views I think he can represent our people, and people are thinking of some of the basic historical point of view. which have a view, he evaluation of the history of some of the heroes of Hunan, like Tang Caichang, Tien-Hua Chen, Yu-Zhi-mo, Tan, etc., that although from a moral, from the personality that we admire these people, but they have died, worth it? In fact, they so young and has staying power, then there is accumulation, they have been able greater cause, but they breaks against, his own life so depleted that they should not be the case. that they should how what? should be like Cai E, Mao Zedong, like, can not win the left, winning the war hit, save power, then, that can act,Bailey UGG boots, so as to win the war, won the individual success, to win you have to master the regime. This is In his view, in fact, many ordinary people think is the problem. they wondering: when faced with powerful forces, we are worth so consumed in? my friend also advised me that: you study history, you should know the laws of history, the laws of history is that extremes meet, any kind of force to the most powerful will to decline when, in its most powerful when you should not go against it, should be avoided, avoid it most of the offensive , so it is down to time, everyone together, all pushing down the wall ... ...
This is the time where I came into contact with ordinary people on the history of ideas, my thoughts on these ideas constitute a significant impact on species, a kind of than the book, scholars of history more real and important. because it is the people's hearts really think. So I would like to address these issues I think.
first show that my own view, I that the history is wrong, no one will stand the test of time. Of course, my purpose is not negative, critical, but they do an academic analysis. My first question is: how come these ideas are ? The idea seems to say it without thinking of our own ideas, but in fact, since the founding of these ideas is the result of sixty years of history education, history textbooks, the idea gradually cultivated. In other words, the surface of many points of view mouth appears to be on our own say, but think you will find one, it is not from our own ideas, but from history textbooks. So we must first clean up of history textbooks, for six years, we have the mainstream , the orthodox view of history to clean up. I will start this problem on two levels: the first part of the history textbooks taught us anything in the end? second part of the history textbooks so that we lose what?
Part : history textbooks taught us anything?
said this issue should be relatively easy to solve. Why do you say? the hands of everyone to get a look at the history textbook, which it has chapters, each chapter 讲了些什么, including our objective laws of history, said Ye Hao, Ye Hao inevitability of history, these things we know at a glance. history textbook says something to impart what knowledge, this is a relatively simple problem, such as the University required courses called to the university, and even to graduate students, we are not open all the history classes of a course is a real history lesson, are the ideological and political education classes (in the strict sense of the history of Education is the influence of the humanities, rather than pure transmission of knowledge and memory, so, the history of professional education need to seriously reflect on history). Of course, these so-called history textbooks will have a choice, be focused on in the narrative and preferences in the choice of historical knowledge will be , but it is true at least in part. 10% of the historical truth, knowledge, and 50% is real, 100% is knowledge, knowledge is always better than no knowledge. So, I was not too tangled problem of this historical fact .
is important that history is taught to our history textbooks to force a certain ideology.
history textbooks emphasize the history, one is the imperialist aggression, which is our nationalism One source of thought. so-called . Now that the New Left were then re-promoting this view, a face-lift is called the
law of history is what it is in the end? is outside the human, happen automatically, or the human will, or produced by human action is a law? in our history textbooks, which it basically been considered to be objective, and not to transfer people's will. But this argument has already been rejected in Xueshu Jie. poverty, Is not is a history of wood --- the wood we were young people playing the game: How does it work? If no one in this society, only the wood, then it will be history? will be the law of history? We say that history is the history of humanity itself, not the history of the wood, then how could it What? the worst of it is that man as wood, as the history of the so-called to connect to the objective laws in the name of, playing history, manipulation, and hence to control and manipulate human purposes.
so-called laws of history, anyone can use any means to achieve the goal, to achieve the goal. the history of all fundamentalists, all of the communist revolutionaries are thinking you action and speech. It is the so-called theoretical basis, legal basis. No matter how much he kill kill, he was always just: correct, the truth at hand!
this students, to seize their own teacher, stunned a stick, and then stepped on kicks, the body Laniao ... ... these things against humanity, why would high school students who appear so good, why they did not think this is a crime? do not think that immoral? is because they think: the development of consistent laws of history, so we bring you the history of these laws against the people (the so-called in hand - not only by their understanding of history, law, and by their representatives, this is a source of legitimacy the ruling party is the ruling party has repeatedly used the legal basis for the inhumane violence and psychological background. Without this psychological background, how one shoot me? ! like saying that a student rushed to the podium at me is a slap in the early Deng, under the hand you play it? Red Guards, but why can not treat their teachers, mothers and fathers treat their own? Why those Public to be treated like citizens Gong Heguo? those with their own parents, who, like a great age? is because they think they represent something, on behalf of the justice, law or this advanced class; that they represent the eternal right. Such thinking is very scary. all evil things always speak in the name noblest; all crime against humanity often by the name of a noble action. the truth so it became a tool of evil, and evil is to spread Dafa, unrestrained ... ...
history textbooks to teach the In history textbooks,UGG boots clearance, in the so-called - Does the truth need to force and violence to survive it? truth and evil, so what is the difference?!
In fact, the intellectual has long been a reflection and criticism which, like Mr. Yuan Weishi. Mr. Yuan Weishi 2006 He said: This analogy also misses the point, generated hostility crazy, like a bullfighter, like mad cow saw the red cloth. retrospect, Landlords, Doo right, fight the performance of people do not do that mad cow bullfighter? ... ...
textbooks promote class hatred, superstition on the leaders and political parties, people have the visual distortion of the normal as evil, the evil as revolution. These books are not taught to the students of humanity, human nature, this sense can be called the wolf's milk, rather it is more drugs, yes, stimulants, narcotics. wolf milk, nutrition and milk is not much difference between the drugs is not as detrimental to human beings.
Sun Kwong: may be reproduced, want to , you realize: compare the spread of knowledge, doubt, and ultimately form their own opinions, ideas. For example, you see the selectively masking the more things; another example of people starved to death during the famine situation, although mention of history textbooks, but Ji-rope if you read the was severely simplified, more and more painful tragedy is an open cover ... ... era, in a network age, history textbooks taught us anything, we ourselves can have their own judgment. We all can do Create your own judgments. of course, first thing, your mind must be open, your information must be diversified, your mind must be independent. If there is no adequate information, there is no diversity of knowledge systems,UGG boots, there is no independent sound mind, you want to know the history textbooks teach you what is still very difficult.
So I said,
(unfinished, to be continued)
No comments:
Post a Comment